Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
We decided that we'll use branches like `2.4` as the target for any changes that we might want to release in a `2.4.x` version like `2.4.1`, so that we can continue to merge changes targeting the next minor release (e.g. `2.5.0`) on master.
Our CI config wasn't set up for this to work properly though, since it was only running checks on PRs targeting master. This should fix it.
I couldn't find a way to do a pattern to only match digits for the branch names from Github's docs, it just looks like a pretty generic glob syntax. But this should do until we get to 3.0
|
|
* ci: Build and test on Go 1.16
* ci: Drop Go 1.14 support
|
|
|
|
* ci: Try Go 1.15 RC1 out of curiosity
* Go 1.15 was released; let's try it
* Update to latest quic-go
* Attempt at fixing broken test
Co-authored-by: Matthew Holt <mholt@users.noreply.github.com>
|
|
* ci: include tracking of GOOS for which Caddy fails to build
* ci: split cross-build check into separate workflow
* ci: cross-build check: make it clear the cross-build check is not a blocker
* ci: cross-build check: set annotation instead of failing the build
* ci: cross-build check: explicitly set continue-on-error to force success marker
* ci: cross-build check: send stderr to /dev/null
* ci: Simplify workflow names
Co-authored-by: Francis Lavoie <lavofr@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Francis Lavoie <lavofr@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Matt Holt <mholt@users.noreply.github.com>
|